In 2012, I earned only $25,000, but I have $300,000 in stocks. I have individual health insurance. Will I be ineligible for a subsidy beginning in January because I am presently insured, or because I have large assets?
In case you haven’t heard, there still are many questions to ask and problems to resolve regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare.
The states have their own part to play under the ACA (and may delay putting certain changes into effect until 2015). Closer to home, there is still the matter of how it affects you individually, and how you and your family can plan for your health insurance under the law.
Kaiser Health News provided some important insights as part of a Q&A entitled, importantly, “Income -- Not Assets -- Will Determine Subsidies In Online Insurance Marketplaces.”
Indeed, the perennial problem many retirees and elderly Americans face is having more assets “on paper” than they do in terms of spendable income. That only makes sense because you planned to have a nest egg sustain your retirement. Now that you have that nest egg, you draw from it only what you need.
As far as ACA is concerned, it is important to know that ACA requires health insurance and will soften the blow with subsidized insurances (when purchased via a health insurance exchange). The government subsidies are not based on your assets, but only on your income.
As a result, anything you earn from the stocks you own, for example, is still income. However, assets in IRA’s or plain old bank accounts will not count against you in terms of insurance. In other words, the nest egg is not meant to be threatened by the health insurance requirement.
Reference: Kaiser Health News (July 2, 2013) “Income -- Not Assets -- Will Determine Subsidies In Online Insurance Marketplaces”